A Stakeholder Rationale for Risk Management: Implications by Gregor Gossy, Univ.-Prof. Dr. Paul Wentges

By Gregor Gossy, Univ.-Prof. Dr. Paul Wentges

In general, merely the pursuits of shareholders, debtholders, and company administration are taken into consideration while studying company monetary judgements whereas the pursuits of non-financial stakeholders are frequently missed. Gregor Gossy develops a so-called stakeholder motive for probability administration arguing that corporations that are extra depending on implicit claims from their non-financial stakeholders, akin to shoppers, providers, and staff, desire conservative monetary rules. which will practice panel facts analyses of the determinants of company monetary judgements, the writer makes use of information from Austrian and German business businesses.

Show description

Read Online or Download A Stakeholder Rationale for Risk Management: Implications for Corporate Finance Decisions PDF

Similar risk management books

Practical risk management : an executive guide to avoiding surprises and losses

A confirmed solution to deal with threat in brand new company global figuring out how the danger approach works is a severe idea that enterprise execs needs to come to benefit. in case you needs to comprehend the basics of possibility administration speedy, with out getting stuck up in jargon, thought, arithmetic, and formulation, useful chance administration is the proper learn.

Landslides in Sensitive Clays: From Geosciences to Risk Management

Landslides in delicate clays characterize a massive danger within the northern nations of the realm corresponding to Canada, Finland, Norway, Russia, Sweden and within the US nation of Alaska. previous and up to date examples of catastrophic landslides at e. g. Saint-Jean-Vianney in 1971, Rissa in 1979, Finneidfjord in 1996 and Kattmarka in 2009 have illustrated the good mobility of the remolded delicate clays and their harmful retrogressive strength.

Market risk management for hedge funds : foundations of the style and implicit value-at-risks

This ebook offers a innovative advent to marketplace chance administration for Hedge money, Hedge cash of cash, and the varied new indices and clones launching coming to industry on a close to day-by-day basis.  it's going to current the basics of quantitative danger measures by way of analysing the  variety of Value-at-Risk (VaR) versions used this day, addressing the robustness of every version, and searching at new hazard measures on hand to extra successfully deal with probability in a hedge fund portfolio.

Additional resources for A Stakeholder Rationale for Risk Management: Implications for Corporate Finance Decisions

Example text

The higher the systematic risk of an asset, the higher the expected return investors will demand. A higher expected return, in turn, means higher costs of capital that reduce the NPV of the security, all else being equal. This relationship between expected return and unavoidable systematic risk and the valuation of securities is regarded as the essence of the CAPM (Naylor and Tapon, 1982: 1166–1167). While under the Markowitz model corporate management can create shareholder value by reducing a firm's total risk, applying the equilibrium capital asset pricing model to 29 30 Note, that there is some conceptual confusion about what constitutes the sources of unsystematic and systematic risk.

9 Given that all complex contracts are unavoidably incomplete, the problem with opportunism is that contracts are not selfenforcing when credible commitments are absent (Williamson, 1998: 31). 1 Characteristics of transactions The natural unit of analysis in Williamson's theory is the transaction. Transactions in the sense of Williamson are not just spot exchanges or long-lasting series of spot exchanges. They are contractual, meaning that the parties become dependent on each other's promises to fulfill (Alchian and Woodward, 1988: 66).

1 General The resource-based view (RBV) of the firm goes back to ideas of Penrose (1959) about the growth of the firm. Penrose regards the firm as a bundle of productive resources (Seth and Thomas, 1994: 177). , 1999: 438). In the 1980s, Penrose's ideas revived through articles by Wernerfelt (1984) and Barney (1986), which eventually led to Barney's (1991) influential article on "Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage" in the Journal of Management (Barney and Hesterly, 1996: 133). , 1999: 437).

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.02 of 5 – based on 47 votes