By J. Swindal
Because the pioneering paintings of Donald Davidson on motion, many philosophers have taken serious stances on his causal account. This booklet criticizes Davidson's event-causal view of motion, and provides as a substitute an agent causal view either to explain what an motion is and to set a framework for the way activities are defined.
Read or Download Action and Existence: A Case for Agent Causation PDF
Best existentialism books
Barth's vigorous, hugely unique choice of brief items is a big landmark of experimental fiction. even though some of the tales accumulated the following have been released individually, there are a number of issues universal to all of them, giving them new that means within the context of this assortment.
Nice philosophers corresponding to Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and Sartre have basically been preoccupied via the potential for authenticity. during this examine, Jacob Golomb appears heavily on the literature and writings of those philosophers in his research in their ethics. Golomb's writing exhibits his passionate dedication to the hunt for the authenticity - fairly in our weather of post-modern scepticism.
"Landmark" builds on what inexperienced persons convey to type and respects their wisdom and event. utilizing real-life listening and studying, "Landmark" will get scholars pondering, noticing, and reacting.
- Kierkegaard and Existentialism
- Flesh and Body: On the Phenomenology of Husserl
- The Outsider (Penguin Modern Classics)
- The Stranger
- Modern French Philosophy: From Existentialism to Postmodernism
Extra info for Action and Existence: A Case for Agent Causation
Only the latter are proper actions (Handlungen) as such. Causal analysis belongs only at the instrumental and strategic levels; it is inconceivable to suppose a 24 Action and Existence causal relation between a norm and an action that conforms to it. ”44 Only when speech acts are aimed towards their proper telos, which is intersubjective agreement, can emancipative coordination and progress obtain. But what exactly is this “completely different way,” in which we achieve action coordination? Habermas has to assume that the discourse situation that determines a norm is a privileged space free from force or coercion.
A dialectical approach explicates two or more oppositions that are nonetheless conditions of single, though complex, existential unity. II. Reconstructive dialectics Two preliminary speciﬁcations must be made about the object and process of a reconstructive dialectical analysis speciﬁcally of human action. First, such an analysis assumes that all human actions are oriented towards presently unrealized future ends or goals. Actions generally aim at either “making true” certain beliefs or fulﬁlling a subjective desired outcome.
First, such an analysis assumes that all human actions are oriented towards presently unrealized future ends or goals. Actions generally aim at either “making true” certain beliefs or fulﬁlling a subjective desired outcome. Since dialectics explicates oppositions inherent in these aim-oriented actions, it is not a constitutive, but regressive analysis. But the regressive nature of it is not merely explicative but contributes to both the understanding of end-oriented action as well as the appreciation of the ends realized.